In an unexpected development, Theodoor V., a former nurse from Veenhuizen, will not be prosecuted in relation to the deaths of roughly 20 patients at the Wilhelmina Hospital in Assen (WZA), as reported today by RTV Drenthe. This decision follows months of investigation prompted by a report filed by the WZA in early 2023, as previously covered by The Northern Times.
The investigation into former nurse Theodoor V. originated from concerns raised by the Wilhelmina Hospital Assen (WZA) in early 2023. Information from mental health provider GGZ Drenthe suggested V. may be linked to the deaths of COVID-19 patients. These concerns were based on conversations between V. and various GGZ Drenthe care providers, where he allegedly admitted to turning off ventilators and administering higher doses of morphine.
No proof of wrongdoing
The Public Prosecution Service (OM) has now concluded its investigation and determined there is insufficient evidence to prove criminal conduct by V. This means he is no longer considered a suspect. The OM highlighted the complexity of the case, citing the lack of specific patient identification in V.’s statements and the fact that the actions described (regulating oxygen and administering morphine) are standard medical procedures.
Additionally, efforts to obtain further evidence through conversations with V.’s doctor’s office were hampered by patient confidentiality laws. Medical expert reviews of patient files during V.’s shifts also yielded no new incriminating evidence.
Reactions and lingering questions
The OM acknowledges the significant impact this situation has had on the families of the deceased patients and the staff of the WZA. They emphasize that the investigation did not uncover any concrete indications of criminal wrongdoing by the nurse in any of the deaths reviewed.
The attorneys representing Theodoor V. have maintained his innocence throughout the investigation. They have expressed relief that the criminal case against him has been closed.
While the OM has dropped the charges, the case raises questions about communication within healthcare settings and potential safeguards to prevent misconduct. It also highlights the challenges of investigating and prosecuting medical malpractice allegations, particularly when evidence relies heavily on the suspect’s own statements.
